Court Denies “Unconscionable” Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan

April 30th, 2010 by Reed Allmand

Share on TwitterSubmit to redditShare via email

Court Decision on Bankruptcy PlanIn the Chapter 13 bankruptcy case of Grafton, Thomas W. and Patricia M.; In re, the bankruptcy court sustained an objection to confirmation of the debtors’ plan saying the plan was not proposed in good faith and that it was unconscionable.

The details of the bankruptcy case:

When the debtor-husband divorced his previous wife, he agreed that any obligations he owed in the couple’s property settlement agreement could not be discharged in bankruptcy. When he filed for bankruptcy two years later, the court determined that his obligation to his former wife was nondischargeable pursuant to Section 523(a)(5). The debtor and his current wife subsequently filed for Chapter 13 relief. The debtor listed a $233,400 unsecured, nonpriority obligation to his former wife. The couple’s plan recognized that the claim was excepted from discharge, but proposed to pay only 2 percent of it over 60 months. The debtor’s former wife, who was 74 years old, objected to confirmation. The court sustained the objec­tion because Section 1322(a)(2) requires full payment of all claims entitled to a priority under Section 507 unless the priority creditor accepts different treatment of its claim. Because the unsecured claim enjoyed priority status as the result of the ruling in the previous case, the plan could not be confirmed over the former spouse’s objection.

The bankruptcy court also noted that the debtor-husband had six secured creditors and had very little income available to pay unsecured creditors due to his high level of secured debt.  The bankruptcy court stated that they suspected that his secured debt was purposely structured in this way to avoid paying creditors that he did not want to pay.  Because of this, the bankruptcy court ruled that the bankruptcy repayment plan was not proposed in good faith and that it could even be considered unconscionable.

Share on TwitterSubmit to redditShare via email
avatar

About Reed Allmand

Website

Allmand's vision is rooted in his own financially precarious childhood in Abilene "My father always had difficulty holding a job and supporting our family, so after my parents divorced when I was 12, my sister and I got jobs to help make ends meet," he recalls. "I remember what it felt like as a child to worry that our car would be repossessed or home foreclosed on."

View all posts by Reed Allmand

Subscribe

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

Leave a Reply

FAQ

Why do I need to submit a new wage order when I modify my plan

When we modify your bankruptcy plan we are changing your plan payments. This means that we have to get with your employer and change the terms and amount of your wage order. The only way we can do that is by filling out a new wage order form.  

Learn More
What happens if the stay terminates on my home?

If the bankruptcy stay terminates on your home that means that even though your in bankruptcy, your creditor can pursue all there legal remedies they can pursue if you were not in bankruptcy. This includes foreclosure, and having your house sold and evicting you from your house.

Learn More

Find Location

map
  • Dallas Bankruptcy

    5646 Milton Street, Ste. 120 Dallas, Texas 75206
  • Fort Worth Bankruptcy

    5601 Bridge Street # 300 Ft Worth, TX 76112

Meet Our Clients