Debtor’s Bankruptcy Deception Ends With $300,000 Loss

January 24th, 2011 by Reed Allmand

Main entrance of Arlington Hall, a residence h...

Debtor’s Bankruptcy Deception Ends With $300,000 Loss--Image via Wikipedia

In a recent bankruptcy case here in Texas, a debtor failed to disclose a pending lawsuit judgment and other assets to the bankruptcy court.  The debtor’s deception cost the creditors and the city money pushing the court to pursue judicial estoppel action against him.

Kim Lubke, formerly an Arlington, Texas, firefighter, obtained a large verdict against the City of Arlington pursuant to the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Lubke v. City of Arlington, 455 F.3d 489 (5th Cir.2006). During the City’s appeal to this court, Lubke and his wife filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case but omitted the pending $1 million-plus judgment from his sworn statements and bankruptcy filings. He obtained a discharge of $300,000 in debt, while the creditors were led to believe his was a “no asset” case.

Once the debtor’s bankruptcy deception was discovered, the court moved to pursue judicial estoppel against the debtor.  After a lengthy and costly court battle, the bankruptcy court ruled that the debtor should be prevented from receiving the FMLA settlement and stopped from pursuing any litigation regarding the issue.  While the bankruptcy court conceded that the debtor was harmed by the former employer and that the FMLA judgment was justified, it was not fair for him to receive it since he hid it from the bankruptcy court and creditors.  The debtor’s deception subsequently cost the bankruptcy court and the creditors money because if they had known about the FMLA settlement they would have at least received some type of payment.

Finally, Lubke, although deprived of a discharge and the proceeds of the FMLA judgment, has effectively been rid of his creditors. By entangling the creditors in his web, he has hindered and delayed their efforts to seek reimbursement of his debts. He has also benefitted from his continued possession and enjoyment of other unscheduled assets—a retail business, farm income, livestock and a mineral lease that Reed evidently chose not to pursue for the creditors’ benefit while the FMLA judgment loomed large.

This bankruptcy case is warning to other debtors who might feel tempted to exclude assets from their filing. Doing so can cost you money, your bankruptcy discharge and place your future financial well-being in harm’s way.

(source: http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020100917103.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR)

Enhanced by Zemanta

About Reed Allmand

Website

Allmand's vision is rooted in his own financially precarious childhood in Abilene "My father always had difficulty holding a job and supporting our family, so after my parents divorced when I was 12, my sister and I got jobs to help make ends meet," he recalls. "I remember what it felt like as a child to worry that our car would be repossessed or home foreclosed on."

View all posts by Reed Allmand

Subscribe

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

    FAQ

    Why do I need to submit a new wage order when I modify my plan

    When we modify your bankruptcy plan we are changing your plan payments. This means that we have to get with your employer and change the terms and amount of your wage order. The only way we can do that is by filling out a new wage order form.  

    Learn More
    What happens if the stay terminates on my home?

    If the bankruptcy stay terminates on your home that means that even though your in bankruptcy, your creditor can pursue all there legal remedies they can pursue if you were not in bankruptcy. This includes foreclosure, and having your house sold and evicting you from your house.

    Learn More

    Find Location

    map
    • Dallas Bankruptcy

      5646 Milton Street, Ste. 120 Dallas, Texas 75206
    • Fort Worth Bankruptcy

      5601 Bridge Street # 300 Ft Worth, TX 76112

    Meet Our Clients