Trustee’s Motion To Alter Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Denied

July 12th, 2011 by Reed Allmand

Share on TwitterSubmit to redditShare via email

Trustee’s Motion To Alter Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Denied

In a recent Chapter 13 bankruptcy case filed by a married couple, the bankruptcy trustee unsuccessfully attempted to alter the repayment plan three years after confirmation.

The details of the bankruptcy case:

The Plan also provided for the Trustee to pay $11,714 plus 9.25% interest to Toyota Motor Credit (“Toyota”) in satisfaction of a secured claim, and for payment of fees due the Trustee and Debtors’ counsel. See Dkt. 2,  B2, C, and E2A. As the only other claimants to be paid under the Plan were unsecured creditors (per the Unsecured Creditors’ Pool), the Plan provided for payments of only approximately $35,000, notwithstanding the Base Amount of $60,000. This discrepancy between the Base Amount and the total payments due under the Plan was apparent from the Plan’s face.

Though there can be no question that the Trustee or any unsecured creditor could have objected to confirmation of the Plan on the basis that a greater share of the Base Amount should go to unsecured creditors, neither the Trustee nor any creditor did so. On November 26, 2007, the court entered the Confirmation Order, which, in accordance with the Plan, stated that “allowed unsecured claims will be paid pro rata from the greater of an unsecured creditor’s [sic] pool of approximately $16,260.00 or non-exempt property of $95.00.” See Dkt. 19.

The bankruptcy plan called for payments over the course of 5 years because the debtors were above-median income earners.  But three years after the confirmation of the bankruptcy plan, the trustee requested that they debtors be forced to pay more money to their unsecured creditors. In response to the bankruptcy trustee’s motion, the debtors requested that the plan be reduced to 36 months since they had already paid their creditors in full.  The bankruptcy court denied the trustee’s request and granted the debtors’ motion because they had already satisfied the payment of creditors and because the trustee and creditors did not object to the plan at confirmation.

(source: Leagle.com)

 

Share on TwitterSubmit to redditShare via email
avatar

About Reed Allmand

Website

Allmand's vision is rooted in his own financially precarious childhood in Abilene "My father always had difficulty holding a job and supporting our family, so after my parents divorced when I was 12, my sister and I got jobs to help make ends meet," he recalls. "I remember what it felt like as a child to worry that our car would be repossessed or home foreclosed on."

View all posts by Reed Allmand

Subscribe

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

Leave a Reply

FAQ

Why do I need to submit a new wage order when I modify my plan

When we modify your bankruptcy plan we are changing your plan payments. This means that we have to get with your employer and change the terms and amount of your wage order. The only way we can do that is by filling out a new wage order form.  

Learn More
What happens if the stay terminates on my home?

If the bankruptcy stay terminates on your home that means that even though your in bankruptcy, your creditor can pursue all there legal remedies they can pursue if you were not in bankruptcy. This includes foreclosure, and having your house sold and evicting you from your house.

Learn More

Find Location

map
  • Dallas Bankruptcy

    5646 Milton Street, Ste. 120 Dallas, Texas 75206
  • Fort Worth Bankruptcy

    5601 Bridge Street # 300 Ft Worth, TX 76112

Meet Our Clients