October 27th, 2009 by Reed Allmand 
According to an article in the Dallas Morning News, over 50 million Social Security recipients, many facing foreclosure and bankruptcy, will not receive a cost of living increase for the first time since cost of living increases were adopted in 1975. Why? Supposedly the prices of critical consumer goods are falling. But I guess they haven’t noticed that many are still struggling with non-consumer goods such as housing during this foreclosure crisis. But I digress.
Cost of living increases for Social Security are based on inflation, which is “officially” negative this year because of “lower” energy costs. But some advocates for seniors say that the formula used to determine increases are faulty because seniors use a large portion of their income to pay for medical care costs, especially prescriptions.
The article said:
“The lack of a cost of living increase triggers several provisions in the law. Among them, the amount of wages subject to Social Security payroll taxes will remain unchanged. The first $106,800 of a worker’s earned income is currently subject to the tax. Also, Medicare Part B premiums for the vast majority of Social Security recipients will remain frozen at 2009 levels. However, premiums for the Medicare prescription drug program, known as Part D, will increase.”
The article gives us all another example of how sometimes the system designed to care for seniors actually does the opposite. Many seniors are already living on the edge. Today, more seniors than ever are still paying on a mortgage and some are even facing foreclosure. The average monthly payout for Social Security is only $1094, hardly enough to cover the expenses of the average senior citizen let alone enough to support one trying to avoid foreclosure or bankruptcy. The other nonsensical provision in our laws covering Social Security is that the Medicare prescription drug program premiums would increase. Prescription drugs are often some of the most expensive items on a senior’s list of expenses. Why would they increase? The good news is that some seniors can expect a $250 stimulus in the mail soon.
About Reed Allmand
Allmand's vision is rooted in his own financially precarious childhood in Abilene "My father always had difficulty holding a job and supporting our family, so after my parents divorced when I was 12, my sister and I got jobs to help make ends meet," he recalls. "I remember what it felt like as a child to worry that our car would be repossessed or home foreclosed on."
View all posts by Reed AllmandSubscribe
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.
